ADTPro over serial won't communicate with host after ADTPro loaded

25 posts / 0 new
Last post
Offline
Last seen: 4 days 13 hours ago
Joined: Feb 1 2024 - 18:56
Posts: 14
ADTPro over serial won't communicate with host after ADTPro loaded

I've done my due dilligence as much as I can by scouring this forum and Google for answers, and found some suggestions, but none seemed to work. I'm trying to send and receive images to my IIe via a super serial card. I can bootstrap just fine over serial from my MBP and from my Win 10 machines, but when I try to receive a file from my host machines, I get the message waiting for reply from host. 

Obviously my card is configured correctly, or else I wouldn't have gotten this far. I've tried both speed settings 19200 and 115200 for the communication speeds making sure that, at least on Windows since it can be configured,  the speed on the host COM port driver is the same. The card is new and I honestly don't think has been ever used before.

The cableing and USB to serial connector should be fine since I can bootstrap. The type of USB to serial adapter is an FTDI. What else is there to try? 

If I hit ESC to cancel the request, I just get a beep and no other response. If I disconnect the serial connection either physically or by using the disconnect button on the host, it'll abort the request and I can then try a different request.

Offline
Last seen: 1 day 5 hours ago
Joined: Jan 31 2024 - 06:40
Posts: 63
I am facing such problem

I am facing such problem every few years. The reason is that somehow the 6551 chip gets burnt without apparent reason. Replacing it resolves the problem. What do you mean you were able to bootstrap? 

Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 21 min ago
Joined: Jun 6 2020 - 10:50
Posts: 416
retro_devices wrote:What do
retro_devices wrote:

What do you mean you were able to bootstrap? 

If you don't have an ADTPro boot disk, you can use the serial port to boot and load the ADTPro software.  

 

https://adtpro.com/bootstrap.html

Offline
Last seen: 1 day 5 hours ago
Joined: Jan 31 2024 - 06:40
Posts: 63
nick3092 wrote:retro_devices
nick3092 wrote:
retro_devices wrote:

What do you mean you were able to bootstrap? 

If you don't have an ADTPro boot disk, you can use the serial port to boot and load the ADTPro software.  

 

https://adtpro.com/bootstrap.html

I know about this feature, I was asking for confirmation from the OP in order to better troubleshoot what's going on their side.

Offline
Last seen: 2 days 9 hours ago
Joined: Dec 1 2022 - 04:19
Posts: 2
ADTPro serial problem

Some time ago i tried to update my system by running it on AppleCommander-ac-1.9.0.jar instead of AppleCommander-1.3.5.13-ac.jar and some other newer java libraries, which ended with the same problem, it failed loading images from the server.

So i went back and everything is working fine again. Currently i use:

AppleCommander-1.3.5.13-ac.jar

jssc-2.9.6.jar

slf4j-nop-1.7.9.jar

Theese files are located in the lib folder beneath ADTPro.

 

You may also remove the /min after start in  adtpro.bat, this will leave the java console open and maybe show some usefull info.

 

Offline
Last seen: 4 days 13 hours ago
Joined: Feb 1 2024 - 18:56
Posts: 14
retro_devices wrote:nick3092
retro_devices wrote:
nick3092 wrote:
retro_devices wrote:

What do you mean you were able to bootstrap? 

If you don't have an ADTPro boot disk, you can use the serial port to boot and load the ADTPro software.  

 

https://adtpro.com/bootstrap.html

I used a host computer over the serial connection to load ProDOS and ADTPro onto my IIe. It does it at 9600 baud and works just fine. Once ADTPro is loaded and I attempt to use the menu to either send or receive an image, it hangs on waiting for host. I'll try out the alternative jar files and see if that changes anyything. Does it work on the Mac too or is that only for Windows?

 

For completeness, I also loaded ADTPro from disk with the same results. It loads up fine, but after selecting serial and having the program load, it's not able to connect to the host for send or receive actions. I initially used this method, and it should have worked fine. I did the other method of using the host to load ADTPro just to verify that the cand was configured correctly so that I could rule out a bad serial card or cabling. Typically, I'd like to load from disk since it's faster to load that way.

Offline
Last seen: 2 days 6 hours ago
Joined: Jul 5 2018 - 09:44
Posts: 2587
I've often wondered about ADT

I've often wondered about ADT...  I've never used it personally.  It seems like something you'd really only need once if you didn't already have boot media or something.  One of the first things I did when I got back into Apple II stuff after many years of it sitting around in storage was to get a flash media storage device.  I have lots of vintage media so I never needed to bootstrap like that.  It seems like it is just so much easier to copy disk images onto an SD card or USB drive and then if I need to I can image to real floppies from there than mess around with serial cables and software setup on both modern computer and Apple II...  Maybe I'm just crazy or maybe I'm missing something?

 

Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 21 min ago
Joined: Jun 6 2020 - 10:50
Posts: 416
softwarejanitor wrote:I've
softwarejanitor wrote:

I've often wondered about ADT...  I've never used it personally.  It seems like something you'd really only need once if you didn't already have boot media or something.  One of the first things I did when I got back into Apple II stuff after many years of it sitting around in storage was to get a flash media storage device.  I have lots of vintage media so I never needed to bootstrap like that.  It seems like it is just so much easier to copy disk images onto an SD card or USB drive and then if I need to I can image to real floppies from there than mess around with serial cables and software setup on both modern computer and Apple II...  Maybe I'm just crazy or maybe I'm missing something?

Sure, if you have a flash/SD device like Floppy Emu, CFFA, wDrive, etc.  Then you can copy all the images you want from your device to a real drive.  But if all you have is a PC and real drive, you need ADTPro if you want to make floppies from images.  Then you can bootstrap once and transfer over an ADT boot disk.  But you'll still need ADT to make floppies of applications/games.

 

 

As to the OPs issue, sounds like something is causing an issue at baud rates higher than 9600.  Using a terminal program on your PC, and dropping to a command prompt on the Apple, I believe you should be able to  do an IN#2 (or whatever slot your SSC is in) and set various baud rates using the SSC prompt (matching them with your serial terminal on your PC) and send text to the IIe.  Ideally you would use like Proterm or something.  But if all you have to work with is a command prompt, this should work.  It's been a long time though, so I might be glossing over or misremembering something here.

 

 

 

Offline
Last seen: 4 days 13 hours ago
Joined: Feb 1 2024 - 18:56
Posts: 14
softwarejanitor wrote:I've
softwarejanitor wrote:

I've often wondered about ADT...  I've never used it personally.  It seems like something you'd really only need once if you didn't already have boot media or something.  One of the first things I did when I got back into Apple II stuff after many years of it sitting around in storage was to get a flash media storage device.  I have lots of vintage media so I never needed to

I need it to make an image of some disks that I want to preserve and I don't have the mass storage option available to me currently.

Online
Last seen: 1 hour 53 min ago
Joined: Feb 27 2021 - 18:59
Posts: 494
config not obvious at all

Is your SSC set up like this?

(both the DIP switches, and the jumper block facing "down" are relevant)

Offline
Last seen: 1 day 5 hours ago
Joined: Jan 31 2024 - 06:40
Posts: 63
robespierre wrote:Is your SSC
robespierre wrote:

Is your SSC set up like this?

[[{"fid":"33848","view_mode":"teaser","fields":{"format":"teaser","alignment":"","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":false,"field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":false},"link_text":null,"type":"media","field_deltas":{"3":{"format":"teaser","alignment":"","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":false,"field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]"

Once ADTPro is running the DIP switches position is irrelevant. Actually on the ADTPro web site a different position for the DIP switches is defined to be good for bootstrapping. 

 

Online
Last seen: 1 hour 53 min ago
Joined: Feb 27 2021 - 18:59
Posts: 494
Not all of the switches are

Not all of the switches are software-defined. SW1-7, SW2-6, and SW2-7 are not. Nothing software can do to affect them.

The other missing detail concerns DOS or ProDOS. If either one is loaded, high-speed serial downloading won't be possible. If a DOS-in-ROM card is in use, for instance, or if the machine is booted from a DOS master disk.

The other thought that occurs to me is about the serial cable itself. A poorly shielded cable will produce more errors at higher speeds.

Offline
Last seen: 4 days 13 hours ago
Joined: Feb 1 2024 - 18:56
Posts: 14
In my case, I have a NULL

In my case, I have a NULL cable, so the arrow on the block is pointing up. But I honestly don't believe that's the issue at this point since I'm sending data successfully at 9600. The cable should be shielded enough that it shouldn't be a problem. I have it placed away from any interference as much as I can. I'll try the terminal solution to see if starting at 9600 baud and then moving to a higher rate works. That hopefully will tell me if it's a speed issue. Also, that debugging tip on not closing the JVM window could be handy.

Offline
Last seen: 2 days 6 hours ago
Joined: Jul 5 2018 - 09:44
Posts: 2587
Running a 6551 based serial

Running a 6551 based serial card on a 1MHz machine much faster than 9600 baud is really a falacy anyway.  That serial chip only as a one byte FIFO, so unless you haver super efficient code driving it, it is going to be generating a ton of IRQs or XON/XOFF or hardware handshaking a lot to keep from losing characters.  Lesser serial chips like 6850s struggle to keep up at 4800.

 

Even on PC clones if you wanted decent serial thruput back in the day you needed a good UART like a 16550B which had mutlibyte FIFOs, and that wass with a CPU usually running at 8MHz or better.

 

Be patient and run serial on un-accellerated Apple II machines at 9600 or lower...  You'll usually be a lot less frustrated that way.

 

 

 

 

Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 21 min ago
Joined: Jun 6 2020 - 10:50
Posts: 416
softwarejanitor wrote:Running
softwarejanitor wrote:

Running a 6551 based serial card on a 1MHz machine much faster than 9600 baud is really a falacy anyway.  That serial chip only as a one byte FIFO, so unless you haver super efficient code driving it, it is going to be generating a ton of IRQs or XON/XOFF or hardware handshaking a lot to keep from losing characters.  Lesser serial chips like 6850s struggle to keep up at 4800.

&n

Except that it works with ADT. And works well. I've used ADT many times with both my IIc (that has the early crappy timing circuit) and my IIe. And actually outside of bootstrapping, ADT only lets you run at 19200 or 115200. So you can't even step it down to 9600 if you wanted to. 

Offline
Last seen: 2 days 6 hours ago
Joined: Jul 5 2018 - 09:44
Posts: 2587
nick3092 wrote
nick3092 wrote:
softwarejanitor wrote:

Running a 6551 based serial card on a 1MHz machine much faster than 9600 baud is really a falacy anyway.  That serial chip only as a one byte FIFO, so unless you haver super efficient code driving it, it is going to be generating a ton of IRQs or XON/XOFF or hardware handshaking a lot to keep from losing characters.  Lesser serial chi

 

 

 

Interesting.  Maybe it works better because it isn't trying to display anything while doing the transfer.  Back in the day when I was doing a lot of RS-232 work I did a lot of thruput measurement and usually even at 9600 with any kind of error checking protocol the throughput was significantly less, and it only got worse if you increased the baud rate.  Maybe the ADT code is better than what we had back then.

 

Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 39 min ago
Joined: Apr 26 2016 - 08:36
Posts: 684
Have you got a terminal

Have you got a terminal program on your Windows PC?

Like HyperTerm?  I think the last time it was included in a Windows distribution was on Windows XP.

 

More importantly are you able to run any sort of software on your Apple II?  Like through a disk image device like a Floppy Emu, SDisk II, BootiHD or CFFA-3000?

If so I'd try running a terminal program like ProTerm 3.1 (Apple IIe) and seeing if you can type communications back and forth to HyperTerm on the Windows PC through your null modem cable and USB-to-Serial adapter (unless you have a true serial port).

Try different baud rates.

I suspect the issue is with the host modern PC and not the Apple II.

Offline
Last seen: 1 week 1 day ago
Joined: Jun 25 2020 - 17:00
Posts: 223
I must agree w/softwarejanitor...
baldrick wrote:

Have you got a terminal program on your Windows PC?

Like HyperTerm?  I think the last time it was included in a Windows distribution was on Windows XP.

 

More importantly are you able to run any sort of software on your Apple II?  Like through a disk image device like a Floppy Emu, SDisk II, BootiHD or CFFA-3000?

If so I'd try running a terminal program li

 

Using the SSC in an Apple IIe at bit rates greater than 19200 is sheer folly and works only under the best of conditions between a DTE and DCE devices or DTE -to-DTE devices via Null Modem cable. 9600 will always be the most reliable and accurate.  Either way it is imperative that both serial communicating devices on both ends must be identically configure.

 

The CFFA card with CiderPress makes what you are needing to do childs play.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Online
Last seen: 1 hour 53 min ago
Joined: Feb 27 2021 - 18:59
Posts: 494
JRE?

Perhaps the issue is the version of Java installed on the host: see https://github.com/ADTPro/adtpro/issues/151

Offline
Last seen: 4 days 13 hours ago
Joined: Feb 1 2024 - 18:56
Posts: 14
Speeds faster than 9600 not working on SSC

I did some testing of the serial connection on the IIe and was able to establish a serial terminal connection to test if the speed of the connection was an issue. What I found is that with 9600 baud I was able to see any text that I typed show up correctly on the apple screen. Anything faster than that was garbled text. This tells me that the card is probably set for only 9600 max speed.

 

Currently, ADTPro only supports 19200 minimum speed for non- bootstrap operations. This is not going to work with my current configuration. Is there a way that I can force the server to use a slower speed? I haven't been able to find any way to do that. Is there a technical reason that it has to be one of the 2 speeds that it does allow? Besides that they're the only options that you can set. Is there a different configuration of the dip switches that allows for the faster speeds to be used? Do I need to make a sacrifice to the Apple Gods to make this work? 

 

For anybody that wants more detail on how I did the serial testing, here's what my process was

- Connected a serial cable to the IIe SSC with the SSC dip switches in the recommended configuration for ADTPro

- Connected a MBP to the serial cable using a USB to serial adapter

- Turned on the IIe and then pressed [Control-Reset] to break out of the boot process

- Typed the following to get to switch to the serial card for input

    - IN#2

    - [Control-A] 14B

- Now it should accept serial input

- On my Mac I opened a terminal window and found the name of the USB serial device by executing

   - ls /dev/cu.*

- This gave me a short list of devices. The device that I'm using is /dev/cu.usbserial-FTDDTMDM. Yours may be different.

- Now I establish a serial connection by executing

    - screen /dev/cu.usbserial-FTDDTMDM 9600

- The "9600" is the baud speed. I started with this because I knew that it should work since that's the speed ADTPro uses for bootstrapping

- When the prompt was displayed on my Terminal, I began typing text. The text appears on the IIe screen as expected. All characters looked correct.

- I exited the serial connection by typing

   - [Control-a] [Control-\] and then confirming the disconnection with 'y'

- I tried a new connection using the faster speed this time

    - screen /dev/cu.usbserial-FTDDTMDM 19200

- This is the minimum speed that ADTPro uses for non-bootstrapping operations. When I started typing the same characters as before, instead of seeing them show up on the screen, I got various symbols displayed instead. This confirms that I was able to establish a connection, but the speed is not what the SSC is able to correctly interpret for some reason. 

Offline
Last seen: 4 days 13 hours ago
Joined: Feb 1 2024 - 18:56
Posts: 14
Found a way to reduce speed to 9600 but still no joy

I discovered that there is an ADTPro.properties file that has some values that you can change in there. I discovered that there a baud rate that looks like it would override the options you have in the UI. I tried changing it to 9600 baud and restarted the server. I saw that it acknowledged the change, but when I tried to do a basic tests of viewing the files directory on the server from the IIe, it still wouldn't work. Something else is still not allowing it to cooperate. It's possible that the client on the IIe actually prevents it from using anything less than 19200, but I can't view the bin file to see if that's a posibility.  Seriously, how has anybody gotten this to work without this much troubleshooting?

Screwtape's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 31 min ago
Joined: Dec 29 2023 - 22:22
Posts: 5
For a serial connection, both

For a serial connection, both ends need to have compatible configurations in order to exchange information successfully. There's no "auto negotiation" as there is in more modern connections like USB or Ethernet, something or somebody has to configure each end individually.

 

When you tell screen to run at 19200 baud, you're only adjusting one end of the connection. The Apple IIe is still expecting characters at 9600, so I'm not surprised it gets confused. Looking at the Super Serial Reference Card, it seems something or someone has to send <Control-A>15B<Return> to make it switch to 19200 baud, but it's not clear to me whether that's something you can type in screen after establishing the connection at 9600 baud, or something you can type at the IIe keyboard.

Offline
Last seen: 13 hours 52 min ago
Joined: Feb 9 2024 - 13:42
Posts: 24
Have you tried comms using ProTerm?

I set-up ProTerm with null-modem and set to 19200 and everything seems to work in both directions. In my case I use screen with Linux but otherwise everything is about the same as your Mac. When I was troubleshooting this for mine, this is what I found:

  1. I had some bad wires on my pigtail and was only getting one-way comms, nothing ever would be received on the Apple side.. I re-soldered to a DB25, instead of the crimp pins.. (Does not sound like your situation but perhaps in reverse?)
  2. For ProTerm, I would only get reliable comms if switch 2-6 was on. i.e. Interrupts. For ADTPro, 2-6 needs to be off, though. Strange.
  3. ADTPro seems to like to start out at 300 baud. That is what they have you set the dip switches to. And then software takes it up from there.
  4.  Sometimes I need to restart ADTPro on the PC side before it starts talking.

SW1: 1001111 SW2: 1101100

Good luck!

Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 39 min ago
Joined: Apr 26 2016 - 08:36
Posts: 684
Sea-Apple wrote:Currently,
Sea-Apple wrote:

Currently, ADTPro only supports 19200 minimum speed for non- bootstrap operations. This is not going to work with my current configuration. Is there a way that I can force the server to use a slower speed? I haven't been able to find any way to do that. Is there a technical reason that it has to be one of the 2 speeds that it does allow? Besides that they're the only options that you can set. Is there a different configuration of the dip switches that allows for the faster speeds to be used? Do I need to make a sacrifice to the Apple Gods to make this work? 

 

This is irrelevant.  ADTPro bypasses all the internal card software and manipulates hardware and interrupts directly.

There has never been an issue transferring disks at top speed, even on an old Apple II+ clone with a clone super serial card.

If you can bootstrap successfully, then I suspect something is wrong on the PC end of hte operation for disk image transfer.  You are using an FTDI type cable, right?

Run your Apple's ADTPro program on it's delivered stock defaults and it should work perfectly.

Try an earlier version of ADTPro and try a different version of Java to see if anything changes.

 

Online
Last seen: 1 hour 53 min ago
Joined: Feb 27 2021 - 18:59
Posts: 494
transparency

For a serial connection, both ends need to have compatible configurations in order to exchange information successfully. There's no "auto negotiation" as there is in more modern connections like USB or Ethernet, something or somebody has to configure each end individually.

Just for maximum triviality, there are some devices that attempt to autodetect the speed of their corresponding serial port (Xyplex and Digi come to mind, but many devices, particularly modems, have that feature), called ABR or "autobaud". It is definitely not implemented in an Apple II serial port card from 1981, however.

When you tell screen to run at 19200 baud, you're only adjusting one end of the connection. The Apple IIe is still expecting characters at 9600, so I'm not surprised it gets confused. Looking at the Super Serial Reference Card, it seems something or someone has to send <Control-A>15B<Return> to make it switch to 19200 baud, but it's not clear to me whether that's something you can type in screen after establishing the connection at 9600 baud, or something you can type at the IIe keyboard.

The serial link itself is transparent: the hardware doesn't interpret the data being sent from the remote host. The way the SSC sets its bit rate is by default using the DIP switches on the card, or by typing IN#2 (the card is in slot 2 by convention), then control-A, a number, B, return. The IN#2 is needed to connect the keyboard to the command handler in the card's firmware, which is what listens for control-A and interprets the following command to write certain values into ACIA registers.

Once a connection is established, if IN#2 is still active, the remote host can send commands to the Apple monitor and read or write any data it likes to the SSC's registers, which can change the speed to any value the ACIA supports. That is how ADTPro loads itself into the Apple at 115200 bps, after initially bootstrapping at the slow speed.

Log in or register to post comments